Is CyberStrike-OffSec-35B or Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 smaller?

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 is smaller at Q4_K_M: 17.28 GiB against 20.22 GiB.

Which uses less memory at long context?

CyberStrike-OffSec-35B — its KV cache at 32K context is 4.8x smaller, because of how its attention layers cache.

Model comparison

CyberStrike-OffSec-35B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507

At Q4_K_M, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 is the smaller download — 18,556,685,824 bytes against 21,713,458,304. At long context the gap widens: CyberStrike-OffSec-35B's KV cache at 32K is 4.8× smaller, which usually matters more than the difference in weights.

From the file· summed bytes, KV per layer

Side by side

	CyberStrike-OffSec-35B	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507
Parameters	35.1B	30.5B
Architecture	qwen35moe	qwen3moe
Layers	40	48
Native context	262,144	262,144
Mixture of experts	yes, 256 experts	yes, 128 experts
Quantizations published	10	51
Smallest quantization	12.34 GiB	7.05 GiB
Q4_K_M	20.22 GiB	17.28 GiB
Licence	apache-2.0	apache-2.0

KV cache by context

the term that decides long-context viability

Context	CyberStrike-OffSec-35B	Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507	Ratio
4,096	0.08 GiB	0.38 GiB	4.80×
8,192	0.16 GiB	0.75 GiB	4.80×
16,384	0.31 GiB	1.50 GiB	4.80×
32,768	0.63 GiB	3.00 GiB	4.80×
65,536	1.25 GiB	6.00 GiB	4.80×
131,072	2.50 GiB	12.00 GiB	4.80×