Model comparison

metatune-gpt20b-R1.09 vs gemma-4-12B-it-qat-q4_0-unquantized

These two publish different quantization sets; the table below has the exact sizes. At long context the gap widens: metatune-gpt20b-R1.09's KV cache at 32K is 3.2× smaller, which usually matters more than the difference in weights.

From the file· summed bytes, KV per layer

Side by side

metatune-gpt20b-R1.09gemma-4-12B-it-qat-q4_0-unquantized
Parameters21.5B12.0B
Architecturegpt-ossgemma4
Layers2448
Native context131,072262,144
Mixture of expertsyes, 32 expertsno
Quantizations published342
Smallest quantization11.19 GiB6.50 GiB
Q4_K_M14.72 GiB
Licenceapache-2.0apache-2.0

KV cache by context

the term that decides long-context viability
Contextmetatune-gpt20b-R1.09gemma-4-12B-it-qat-q4_0-unquantizedRatio
4,0960.11 GiB0.72 GiB6.46×
8,1920.21 GiB0.97 GiB4.72×
16,3840.39 GiB1.47 GiB3.74×
32,7680.77 GiB2.47 GiB3.22×
65,5361.52 GiB4.47 GiB2.94×
131,0723.02 GiB8.47 GiB2.81×
metatune-gpt20b-R1.09 vs gemma-4-12B-it-qat-q4_0-unquantized — size, memory and hardware fit — ossmodeldb