Is MiroThinker-v1.0-30B or Qwen3.8-27B smaller?

Qwen3.8-27B is smaller at Q4_K_M: 15.66 GiB against 17.35 GiB.

Which uses less memory at long context?

Qwen3.8-27B — its KV cache at 32K context is 1.5x smaller, because of how its attention layers cache.

Model comparison

MiroThinker-v1.0-30B vs Qwen3.8-27B

At Q4_K_M, Qwen3.8-27B is the smaller download — 16,810,714,336 bytes against 18,632,184,640. At long context the gap widens: Qwen3.8-27B's KV cache at 32K is 1.5× smaller, which usually matters more than the difference in weights.

From the file· summed bytes, KV per layer

Side by side

	MiroThinker-v1.0-30B	Qwen3.8-27B
Parameters	30.5B	27.8B
Architecture	qwen3moe	qwen35
Layers	48	64
Native context	262,144	262,144
Mixture of experts	yes, 128 experts	no
Quantizations published	48	22
Smallest quantization	5.98 GiB	8.39 GiB
Q4_K_M	17.35 GiB	15.66 GiB
Licence	mit	apache-2.0

KV cache by context

the term that decides long-context viability

Context	MiroThinker-v1.0-30B	Qwen3.8-27B	Ratio
4,096	0.38 GiB	0.25 GiB	1.50×
8,192	0.75 GiB	0.50 GiB	1.50×
16,384	1.50 GiB	1.00 GiB	1.50×
32,768	3.00 GiB	2.00 GiB	1.50×
65,536	6.00 GiB	4.00 GiB	1.50×
131,072	12.00 GiB	8.00 GiB	1.50×