Is Qwen3.6-9B-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking-Sweet-Madness or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B smaller?

Qwen3.6-9B-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking-Sweet-Madness is smaller at Q4_K_M: 5.09 GiB against 19.71 GiB.

Which uses less memory at long context?

Qwen3.6-9B-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking-Sweet-Madness — its KV cache at 32K context is 1.3x smaller, because of how its attention layers cache.

Model comparison

Qwen3.6-9B-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking-Sweet-Madness vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

At Q4_K_M, Qwen3.6-9B-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking-Sweet-Madness is the smaller download — 5,463,652,192 bytes against 21,166,757,728. At long context the gap widens: Qwen3.6-9B-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking-Sweet-Madness's KV cache at 32K is 1.3× smaller, which usually matters more than the difference in weights.

From the file· summed bytes, KV per layer

Side by side

	Qwen3.6-9B-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking-Sweet-Madness	Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Parameters	9.1B	36.0B
Architecture	qwen35	qwen35moe
Layers	16	40
Native context	262,144	262,144
Mixture of experts	no	yes, 256 experts
Quantizations published	2	61
Smallest quantization	4.88 GiB	8.77 GiB
Q4_K_M	5.09 GiB	19.71 GiB
Licence	apache-2.0	apache-2.0

KV cache by context

the term that decides long-context viability

Context	Qwen3.6-9B-Heretic-Uncensored-Thinking-Sweet-Madness	Qwen3.6-35B-A3B	Ratio
4,096	0.06 GiB	0.08 GiB	1.25×
8,192	0.13 GiB	0.16 GiB	1.25×
16,384	0.25 GiB	0.31 GiB	1.25×
32,768	0.50 GiB	0.63 GiB	1.25×
65,536	1.00 GiB	1.25 GiB	1.25×
131,072	2.00 GiB	2.50 GiB	1.25×