Kimi-K2.5
moonshotai/Kimi-K2.5Kimi-K2.5 at Q4_K_M is exactly 580,355,550,784 bytes (540.50 GiB / 580.36 GB) — an effective 4.386 bits per weight, not the nominal 4. Its KV cache at 32K is 2.14 GiB.
Shipped quantizations
| Quant | Size● | Exact bytes● | Effective bpw● | Tensors● | Publisher |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQ1_S6 shards | 195.86 GiB | 210,299,214,240 | 1.589 | — | bartowski |
| IQ1_M6 shards | 204.50 GiB | 219,584,616,864 | 1.659 | — | bartowski |
| UD-TQ1_05 shards | 223.09 GiB | 239,537,642,336 | 1.810 | — | unsloth |
| IQ2_XXS7 shards | 228.43 GiB | 245,277,612,576 | 1.854 | — | bartowski |
| UD-IQ1_S6 shards | 256.97 GiB | 275,914,841,088 | 2.085 | — | unsloth |
| IQ2_XXS7 shards | 262.75 GiB | 282,123,639,296 | 2.132 | — | AesSedai |
| IQ2_XS8 shards | 263.67 GiB | 283,113,380,512 | 2.140 | — | bartowski |
| IQ2_S8 shards | 264.31 GiB | 283,797,330,528 | 2.145 | — | bartowski |
| UD-IQ1_M7 shards | 279.94 GiB | 300,581,903,456 | 2.272 | — | unsloth |
| IQ2_M9 shards | 300.77 GiB | 322,954,304,224 | 2.441 | — | bartowski |
| UD-IQ2_XXS7 shards | 304.30 GiB | 326,739,713,088 | 2.469 | — | unsloth |
| IQ2_S8 shards | 311.72 GiB | 334,707,628,704 | 2.530 | — | AesSedai |
| UD-IQ2_M7 shards | 321.54 GiB | 345,247,374,432 | 2.609 | — | unsloth |
| Q2_K10 shards | 334.01 GiB | 358,637,722,528 | 2.710 | — | bartowski |
| Q2_K_L10 shards | 335.08 GiB | 359,784,602,528 | 2.719 | — | bartowski |
| Q2_K8 shards | 348.11 GiB | 373,777,038,496 | 2.825 | — | unsloth |
| Q2_K_L8 shards | 348.36 GiB | 374,052,289,696 | 2.827 | — | unsloth |
| IQ3_XXS11 shards | 376.80 GiB | 404,581,325,856 | 3.058 | — | bartowski |
| IQ3_S10 shards | 377.51 GiB | 405,348,096,896 | 3.063 | — | AesSedai |
| UD-IQ3_XXS9 shards | 386.32 GiB | 414,812,757,344 | 3.135 | — | unsloth |
| IQ3_XS11 shards | 391.23 GiB | 420,081,867,776 | 3.175 | — | bartowski |
| Q3_K_S10 shards | 412.72 GiB | 443,155,058,112 | 3.349 | — | unsloth |
| Q3_K_S12 shards | 414.28 GiB | 444,827,360,352 | 3.362 | — | bartowski |
| IQ3_M13 shards | 434.81 GiB | 466,870,099,264 | 3.528 | — | bartowski |
| Q3_K_M13 shards | 435.23 GiB | 467,321,920,864 | 3.532 | — | bartowski |
| Q3_K_L13 shards | 454.05 GiB | 487,537,745,216 | 3.684 | — | bartowski |
| Q3_K_M11 shards | 456.14 GiB | 489,771,716,096 | 3.701 | — | unsloth |
| IQ4_XS12 shards | 509.60 GiB | 547,174,473,344 | 4.135 | — | unsloth |
| IQ4_XS14 shards | 510.00 GiB | 547,605,634,464 | 4.138 | — | bartowski |
| IQ4_NL12 shards | 539.30 GiB | 579,064,700,704 | 4.376 | — | unsloth |
| IQ4_NL16 shards | 539.67 GiB | 579,469,909,568 | 4.379 | — | bartowski |
| Q4_K_S16 shards | 540.00 GiB | 579,815,480,896 | 4.382 | — | bartowski |
| Q4_K_M16 shards | 540.50 GiB | 580,355,550,784 | 4.386 | — | bartowski |
| Q5_K_S16 shards | 540.65 GiB | 580,517,834,304 | 4.387 | — | bartowski |
| Q4_013 shards | 541.26 GiB | 581,169,684,384 | 4.392 | — | unsloth |
| Q4_K_L16 shards | 541.31 GiB | 581,227,179,584 | 4.393 | — | bartowski |
| Q5_K_M16 shards | 541.32 GiB | 581,232,893,504 | 4.393 | — | bartowski |
| Q6_K16 shards | 542.20 GiB | 582,178,528,832 | 4.400 | — | bartowski |
| Q4_K_S13 shards | 543.24 GiB | 583,297,376,128 | 4.408 | — | unsloth |
| Q8_016 shards | 543.62 GiB | 583,710,875,200 | 4.411 | — | bartowski |
KV cache by context
| Context | KV cache (f16)● | Flat formula | Overstated by | Full / windowed / recurrent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,096 | 0.27 GiB | 9.53 GiB | 35.56× | 61 / 0 / 0 |
| 8,192 | 0.54 GiB | 19.06 GiB | 35.56× | 61 / 0 / 0 |
| 16,384 | 1.07 GiB | 38.13 GiB | 35.56× | 61 / 0 / 0 |
| 32,768 | 2.14 GiB | 76.25 GiB | 35.56× | 61 / 0 / 0 |
| 65,536 | 4.29 GiB | 152.50 GiB | 35.56× | 61 / 0 / 0 |
| 131,072 | 8.58 GiB | 305.00 GiB | 35.56× | 61 / 0 / 0 |
This model uses multi-head latent attention. No V cache is allocated at all, and the K cache stores a 512-wide latent plus 64 rope dimensions — so reading num_key_value_heads from config.json and multiplying, as every calculator does, overstates the cache by well over an order of magnitude.
Compare with
Will it run on your card?
Why other calculators give a different number
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate puts Q4_K_M at roughly 554.56 GiB. The real file is 540.50 GiB, because a quantization is a mixture and some tensors are always kept at higher precision. The larger discrepancy is the cache: this model allocates no value cache at all, so any formula reading num_key_value_heads overstates it by more than an order of magnitude.
Architecture
Questions people ask
- How much VRAM does Kimi-K2.5 need?
- Q4_K_M is exactly 580,355,550,784 bytes (540.50 GiB) in weights. Add the KV cache, which depends on your context length, plus roughly half a gigabyte of runtime overhead.
- How large is Kimi-K2.5's KV cache?
- 2.14 GiB at 32K context with an f16 cache, computed per layer. Quantizing the cache to q8_0 roughly halves it, which is often the difference between a context length fitting and not.
- Is Kimi-K2.5 a mixture-of-experts model?
- Yes — 384 experts, 8 routed per token. Every expert must be resident, but only the routed ones are read per token, which is why its memory requirement and its speed behave very differently.
- Which quantization of Kimi-K2.5 should I use?
- Q4_K_M is the usual default. Pick the largest quantization that fits your card at the context you actually need — the table above gives exact sizes for every one published.