Quantization publisher

EpistemeAI

EpistemeAI publishes 2 quantizations across 2 models in our index, averaging 8.035 effective bits per weight. Their files differ in size from other publishers' builds of the same nominal quantization on 2 of the pairs we can compare — the same label does not mean the same file.

From the file· summed file bytes
Repositories
2
Quantizations
2
Models covered
2
Avg effective bpw
8.035
across their files

Same model, same quant label, different bytes

largest disagreements first
ModelQuantEpistemeAIvsTheirsDifference
OpenMedResearch-Gemma-4E4NQ8_07.48 GiBmradermacher7.48 GiB-0.0%
Reasoning-Medical0.1-E4B-sftQ8_07.48 GiBmradermacher7.48 GiB-0.0%

A quantization label describes a target, not a recipe. Publishers make different choices about which tensors to keep at higher precision, and some apply an importance matrix while others don't — so two files both honestly labelled the same thing can differ measurably in size and in quality.

Models they publish

ModelQuantizationsSmallest
Reasoning-Medical0.1-E4B-sft17.48 GiB
OpenMedResearch-Gemma-4E4N17.48 GiB