Quantization publisher

leejet

leejet publishes 10 quantizations across 3 models in our index, averaging 6.225 effective bits per weight. Their files differ in size from other publishers' builds of the same nominal quantization on 10 of the pairs we can compare — the same label does not mean the same file.

From the file· summed file bytes
Repositories
3
Quantizations
10
Models covered
3
Avg effective bpw
6.225
across their files

Same model, same quant label, different bytes

largest disagreements first
ModelQuantleejetvsTheirsDifference
Z-Image-TurboQ2_K2.41 GiBunsloth3.39 GiB-28.8%
Z-Image-TurboQ4_03.43 GiBunsloth4.27 GiB-19.7%
Z-Image-TurboQ5_04.23 GiBunsloth4.90 GiB-13.7%
Z-Image-TurboQ8_06.13 GiBjayn76.73 GiB-9.0%
Z-Image-TurboQ6_K4.90 GiBunsloth5.50 GiB-11.0%
Z-Image-TurboQ6_K4.90 GiBjayn75.50 GiB-11.0%
Z-Image-TurboQ8_06.13 GiBunsloth6.73 GiB-9.0%
FLUX.2-klein-4BQ8_04.01 GiBponpoke3.99 GiB+0.5%
FLUX.2-klein-4BQ8_04.01 GiBunsloth4.01 GiB-0.0%
FLUX.2-klein-4BQ4_02.29 GiBunsloth2.29 GiB-0.0%

A quantization label describes a target, not a recipe. Publishers make different choices about which tensors to keep at higher precision, and some apply an importance matrix while others don't — so two files both honestly labelled the same thing can differ measurably in size and in quality.

Models they publish

ModelQuantizationsSmallest
FLUX.2-klein-4B22.29 GiB
Z-Image-Turbo72.41 GiB
ideogram-4-fp8110.51 GiB