Quantization publisher

wangzhang

wangzhang publishes 10 quantizations across 3 models in our index, averaging 9.733 effective bits per weight. Their files differ in size from other publishers' builds of the same nominal quantization on 4 of the pairs we can compare — the same label does not mean the same file.

From the file· summed file bytes
Repositories
3
Quantizations
10
Models covered
3
Avg effective bpw
9.733
across their files

Same model, same quant label, different bytes

largest disagreements first
ModelQuantwangzhangvsTheirsDifference
gemma-4-31B-it-abliteratedQ5_K_M20.35 GiBmradermacher20.35 GiB0.0%
gemma-4-31B-it-abliteratedQ8_030.39 GiBmradermacher30.39 GiB0.0%
Qwen3.6-27B-abliteratedQ4_K_M15.41 GiBmradermacher15.41 GiB-0.0%
Qwen3.6-27B-abliteratedQ8_026.63 GiBmradermacher26.63 GiB-0.0%

A quantization label describes a target, not a recipe. Publishers make different choices about which tensors to keep at higher precision, and some apply an importance matrix while others don't — so two files both honestly labelled the same thing can differ measurably in size and in quality.

Models they publish

ModelQuantizationsSmallest
gemma-4-31B-it-abliterated420.35 GiB
gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-abliterix315.64 GiB
Qwen3.6-27B-abliterated315.41 GiB