Can I run DeepSeek-V2.5 on a Radeon RX 6500 XT?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of DeepSeek-V2.5 fits Radeon RX 6500 XT at any context we compute, with q4_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 44.14 GiB in weights alone, against 3.72 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q8_0 | 233.41 GiB | 234.4 | 234.5 | 234.6 | 234.9 | 235.5 | 236.7 |
| Q6_K | 180.25 GiB | 181.3 | 181.3 | 181.5 | 181.8 | 182.4 | 183.6 |
| Q5_K | 155.74 GiB | 156.8 | 156.8 | 157.0 | 157.3 | 157.9 | 159.1 |
| Q5_K_M | 155.74 GiB | 156.8 | 156.8 | 157.0 | 157.3 | 157.9 | 159.1 |
| Q5_K_S | 151.16 GiB | 152.2 | 152.2 | 152.4 | 152.7 | 153.3 | 154.5 |
| Q4_K | 132.67 GiB | 133.7 | 133.8 | 133.9 | 134.2 | 134.8 | 136.0 |
| Q4_K_M | 132.67 GiB | 133.7 | 133.8 | 133.9 | 134.2 | 134.8 | 136.0 |
| Q4_K_S | 124.68 GiB | 125.7 | 125.8 | 125.9 | 126.2 | 126.8 | 128.0 |
| Q4_0 | 124.23 GiB | 125.2 | 125.3 | 125.5 | 125.8 | 126.4 | 127.5 |
| IQ4_NL | 123.78 GiB | 124.8 | 124.9 | 125.0 | 125.3 | 125.9 | 127.1 |
| IQ4_XS | 116.94 GiB | 118.0 | 118.0 | 118.2 | 118.5 | 119.1 | 120.3 |
| Q3_K_L | 113.97 GiB | 115.0 | 115.1 | 115.2 | 115.5 | 116.1 | 117.3 |
| Q3_K | 104.93 GiB | 105.9 | 106.0 | 106.2 | 106.5 | 107.1 | 108.2 |
| IQ3_M | 96.27 GiB | 97.3 | 97.4 | 97.5 | 97.8 | 98.4 | 99.6 |
| IQ3_S | 94.70 GiB | 95.7 | 95.8 | 95.9 | 96.2 | 96.8 | 98.0 |
| Q3_K_S | 94.70 GiB | 95.7 | 95.8 | 95.9 | 96.2 | 96.8 | 98.0 |
| IQ3_XS | 89.69 GiB | 90.7 | 90.8 | 90.9 | 91.2 | 91.8 | 93.0 |
| IQ3_XXS | 84.61 GiB | 85.6 | 85.7 | 85.8 | 86.1 | 86.7 | 87.9 |
| Q2_K_L | 80.52 GiB | 81.5 | 81.6 | 81.8 | 82.1 | 82.6 | 83.8 |
| Q2_K | 80.04 GiB | 81.1 | 81.1 | 81.3 | 81.6 | 82.2 | 83.4 |
| Q2_K_S | 74.13 GiB | 75.1 | 75.2 | 75.4 | 75.7 | 76.3 | 77.4 |
| IQ2_M | 71.64 GiB | 72.7 | 72.7 | 72.9 | 73.2 | 73.8 | 75.0 |
| IQ2_S | 65.07 GiB | 66.1 | 66.2 | 66.3 | 66.6 | 67.2 | 68.4 |
| IQ2_XS | 63.99 GiB | 65.0 | 65.1 | 65.2 | 65.5 | 66.1 | 67.3 |
| IQ2_XXS | 57.28 GiB | 58.3 | 58.4 | 58.5 | 58.8 | 59.4 | 60.6 |
| IQ1_M | 49.06 GiB | 50.1 | 50.2 | 50.3 | 50.6 | 51.2 | 52.4 |
| IQ1_S | 44.14 GiB | 45.2 | 45.2 | 45.4 | 45.7 | 46.3 | 47.4 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, this model uses latent attention and allocates no V cache at all, so any formula reading num_key_value_heads overstates its cache by more than an order of magnitude.