Can I run magnum-v4-27b on a GeForce RTX 5050?
Not at these settings. No indexed quantization of magnum-v4-27b fits GeForce RTX 5050 at any context we compute, with q8_0 KV. The smallest shipped quantization is 7.82 GiB in weights alone, against 7.44 GiB usable. CPU offload can still run it, slowly.
Every quantization at every context
| Quant | Weights● | 4K◐ | 8K◐ | 16K◐ | 32K◐ | 64K◐ | 128K◐ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F16 | 50.72 GiB | 52.4 | 52.8 | 53.6 | 55.1 | 58.2 | 64.3 |
| Q8_0 | 26.95 GiB | 28.6 | 29.1 | 29.8 | 31.4 | 34.4 | 40.5 |
| Q6_K_L | 21.08 GiB | 22.8 | 23.2 | 24.0 | 25.5 | 28.5 | 34.7 |
| Q6_K | 20.81 GiB | 22.5 | 22.9 | 23.7 | 25.2 | 28.3 | 34.4 |
| Q5_K_L | 18.34 GiB | 20.0 | 20.5 | 21.2 | 22.8 | 25.8 | 31.9 |
| Q5_K_M | 18.08 GiB | 19.8 | 20.2 | 21.0 | 22.5 | 25.5 | 31.7 |
| Q5_K_S | 17.59 GiB | 19.3 | 19.7 | 20.5 | 22.0 | 25.1 | 31.2 |
| Q4_K_L | 15.77 GiB | 17.5 | 17.9 | 18.7 | 20.2 | 23.2 | 29.4 |
| Q4_K_M | 15.50 GiB | 17.2 | 17.6 | 18.4 | 19.9 | 23.0 | 29.1 |
| Q4_K_S | 14.66 GiB | 16.4 | 16.8 | 17.5 | 19.1 | 22.1 | 28.2 |
| Q4_0 | 14.60 GiB | 16.3 | 16.7 | 17.5 | 19.0 | 22.1 | 28.2 |
| IQ4_XS | 13.80 GiB | 15.5 | 15.9 | 16.7 | 18.2 | 21.3 | 27.4 |
| Q3_K_L | 13.52 GiB | 15.2 | 15.6 | 16.4 | 17.9 | 21.0 | 27.1 |
| Q3_K_M | 12.50 GiB | 14.2 | 14.6 | 15.4 | 16.9 | 20.0 | 26.1 |
| IQ3_M | 11.60 GiB | 13.3 | 13.7 | 14.5 | 16.0 | 19.1 | 25.2 |
| Q3_K_S | 11.33 GiB | 13.0 | 13.5 | 14.2 | 15.8 | 18.8 | 24.9 |
| IQ3_XS | 10.76 GiB | 12.5 | 12.9 | 13.6 | 15.2 | 18.2 | 24.3 |
| Q2_K_L | 10.00 GiB | 11.7 | 12.1 | 12.9 | 14.4 | 17.5 | 23.6 |
| Q2_K | 9.73 GiB | 11.4 | 11.9 | 12.6 | 14.1 | 17.2 | 23.3 |
| IQ2_M | 8.75 GiB | 10.5 | 10.9 | 11.6 | 13.2 | 16.2 | 22.3 |
| IQ2_S | 8.06 GiB | 9.8 | 10.2 | 10.9 | 12.5 | 15.5 | 21.6 |
| IQ2_XS | 7.82 GiB | 9.5 | 9.9 | 10.7 | 12.2 | 15.3 | 21.4 |
Figures are GiB of total memory: weights plus KV cache plus compute buffer and backend overhead. Weights and KV are near-exact; the overhead term is modeled. Hover any cell for the breakdown.
Why other calculators disagree
A parameters × bits ÷ 8 estimate ignores two things that dominate at long context. First, the weights themselves are not the nominal rate — quantizations are mixtures, so the real file is consistently larger than the label implies. Second, most of this model's layers cache only a 4,096-token window rather than the full context.